Open Access

Metaphorical conceptualisation of critical thinking: A thematic analysis from a higher education perspective

1 Selçuk University, Faculty of Education, Konya, Türkiye ROR

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine how university students construct the concept of critical thinking. In this context, the research design was determined to be phenomenology, one of the qualitative research designs.  The study group consisted of 85 undergraduate students taking the “Critical and Analytical Thinking” course at a state university in Türkiye. Data were collected through an open-ended question posed to participants: “Critical thinking is like... because...”. This sentence allowed participants to express their understanding of critical thinking through a metaphor and to support their comparisons with a brief explanation. The metaphors obtained in the study were analysed, and the students’ perceptions of critical thinking were classified under five themes: argument, development, discovery, perspective, and questioning. The analysis revealed that the theme “Questioning” generated the most metaphors among university students. Conversely, the theme with the fewest metaphors was “Argumentation”, and the number of metaphors in this theme was significantly lower than in other themes. The findings reveal that students approach critical thinking from different angles and interpret this process through different conceptual frameworks.

Keywords

How to Cite

Ergin, E. (2026). Metaphorical conceptualisation of critical thinking: A thematic analysis from a higher education perspective. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 17(63), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.70736/ijoess.1994

References

📄 Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1). [Crossref]
📄 Amin, M., Mahanal, S., & Rohman, F. (2022). Analyzing the contribution of critical thinking skills and social skills on students’ character by applying discovery learning models. International Journal of Education and Practice, 10(1), 42-53. [Crossref]
📄 Bailin, S., & Siegel, H. (2003). Critical thinking. The Blackwell Guide to The Philosophy of Education, 181-193. [Crossref]
📄 Banks, J. A. (2004). Diversity and citizenship education: Global perspectives. Jossey-Bass.
📄 Bean, J. C., & Melzer, D. (2021). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.