Open Access

The mediating role of metacognitive beliefs in the relationship between early maladaptive schemas and grandiose and vulnerable narcissism

1 Department of Psychology, Eurasia University, Trabzon, Türkiye ROR
2 Department of Psychology, Üsküdar University, Istanbul, Türkiye ROR

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the mediating role of metacognitive beliefs in the relationship between early maladaptive schemas and narcissism subtypes (grandiose and vulnerable narcissism). The sample consisted of 189 participants aged between 18 and 50 years. Data were collected using the Young Schema Questionnaire–Short Form 3 (YSQ-SF3), the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30), and the Five-Factor Narcissism Scale. Pearson correlation, multiple regression, and mediation analyses were conducted to analyze the data. The findings indicated significant positive associations between early maladaptive schemas and metacognitive beliefs. Metacognitive beliefs were significantly related to vulnerable narcissism, whereas no significant relationship was found with grandiose narcissism. Regression analyses revealed that the schema domains of impaired autonomy and unrelenting standards significantly predicted vulnerable narcissism, while impaired limits significantly predicted grandiose narcissism. Mediation analyses demonstrated that metacognitive beliefs partially mediated the relationship between schema domains and vulnerable narcissism. Overall, the results suggest that vulnerable narcissism is more closely associated with schema-based vulnerability and maladaptive metacognitive processes. This study is noteworthy in that it highlights the importance of addressing narcissism not only within the context of personality traits but also within the framework of cognitive and metacognitive processes. In particular, the finding that vulnerable narcissism is associated with early maladaptive schemas and dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs contributes to a better understanding of the cognitive mechanisms underlying narcissistic structures. Furthermore, demonstrating the mediating role of metacognitive beliefs supports the influence of metacognitive processes in the maintenance of psychopathology and indicates that clinical interventions should focus not only on schemas but also on individuals’ beliefs about their own thinking processes. In this respect, the study is important as it provides a theoretical basis for the integrated evaluation of schema therapy and metacognitive therapy approaches.

Keywords

How to Cite

Ince, I., & Narter, M. (2026). The mediating role of metacognitive beliefs in the relationship between early maladaptive schemas and grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 17(64), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.70736/ijoess.2343

References

📄 Anayurt, A., & Yalçın, İ. (2021). Duygu düzenlemesi, erken uyumsuz şemalar, bilişsel esneklik ve düşünme arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 29(4), 194–204. [Crossref]
📄 Besser, A., & Priel, B. (2010). Grandiose narcissism versus vulnerable narcissism in threatening situations: Emotional reactions to achievement failure and interpersonal rejection. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(8), 874–902. [Crossref]
📄 Carlucci, L., D’Ambrosio, I., Innamorati, M., Saggino, A., & Balsamo, M. (2018). Co-rumination, anxiety, and maladaptive cognitive schemas: When friendship can hurt. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 11, 133–144. [Crossref]
📄 Clemence, A. J., Perry, J. C., & Plakun, E. M. (2009). Narcissistic and borderline personality disorders in a sample of treatment refractory patients. Psychiatric Annals, 39(4), 175–184. [Crossref]
📄 Cramer, P. (1999). Personality, personality disorders, and defense mechanisms. Journal of Personality, 67(3), 535–554. [Crossref]