Open Access

Comparing the maximal aerobic speed assessed with laboratory and field tests in soccer players

1 Eskisehir Technic University, Sport Science Faculty, Eskisehir, Turkiye
2 Eskisehir Technic University, Sport Science Faculty, Eskisehir, Turkiye
3 Eskisehir Technic University, Sport Science Faculty, Eskisehir, Turkiye
4 Eskisehir Technic University, Sport Science Faculty, Eskisehir, Turkiye

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the maximal aerobic speed (MAS) obtained from the VAM-EVAL and Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test (YYIR1), with an incremental (1km.h-1 per min) treadmill test in soccer players. Eighteen amateur male soccer players, were evaluated with the following tests: a) a treadmill test to directly determine values of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and MAS (Treadmill); b) an indirect VAM-EVAL Test; c) an indirect YYIR1. The results demonstrated that the last speed, distance, and test duration values are significantly different among the tests (p<0.05)]. The highest MAS value was recorded during the treadmill test (17.10±1.38 km.h-1) which was significantly different from YYIR1 and VAM-EVAL tests (15.82±0.66 and 14.33±0.69 km.h-1, respectively; p<0.001).  The analysis also showed that treadmill MAS value was significantly correlated with YYIR1 MAS (r = 0.656) and VAM-EVAL MAS values (r =0.625), also YYIR1 MAS value was significantly correlated with VAM-EVAL MAS value (r=0.662). It was concluded that the MAS and the VO2max values are significantly different among YYIR1, VAM-EVAL and selected treadmill protocol, and support the idea that they should not be used interchangeably. From a practical perspective, MAS seems to be more important for coaches than VO2max. Both laboratory and field tests can be useful for assessing MAS; however, field tests should be preferred for training purposes.

Keywords

How to Cite

Akdogan, E., Aygun, C., Cakir-Atabek, H., & Cerrah, A. O. (2023). Comparing the maximal aerobic speed assessed with laboratory and field tests in soccer players. Journal of ROL Sport Sciences, 4(3), 964–980. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8354054

References

📄 Ahmaidi, S., Collomp, K., Caillaud, C., & Prefaut, C. (1992). Maximal and functional aerobic capacity as assessed by two graduated field methods in comparison to laboratory exercise testing in moderately trained subjects. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 13(03), 243-248.
📄 Aziz, A. R., Tan, F. H., & Teh, K. C. (2005). A pilot study comparing two field tests with the treadmill run test in soccer players. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 4(2), 105.
📄 Alemdaroğlu, U., Dündar, U., Köklü, Y., & Aşcı, A. (2012). Evaluation of aerobic capacity in soccer players: comparison of field and laboratory tests. Biology of Sport, 29(2), 157-161.
📄 Balasekaran, G., Loh, M. K., Boey, P., & Ng, Y. C. (2023). Determination, measurement, and validation of maximal aerobic speed. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 8006.
📄 Bangsbo, J., Iaia, F. M., & Krustrup, P. (2008). The Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test: a useful tool for evaluation of physical performance in intermittent sports. Sports Medicine, (38), 37-51.