Open Access

The relationship between narcissistic personality traits, religious attitudes, and cognitive flexibility

1 Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Institute of Social Sciences, Erzincan, Turkiye ROR
2 Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Erzincan, Turkiye ROR

Abstract

This study addresses a significant gap in the literature by examining the relationships between narcissism, religious attitudes, and cognitive flexibility in an integrative manner; thereby clarifying the interaction between personality traits, belief systems, and cognitive processes, and contributing both to theoretical knowledge and mental health practices. The sample consisted of 407 participants (163 males, 244 females). Data were collected using the Brief Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory, the Ok Religious Attitude Scale, and the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory, and analyzed through correlation and regression methods. Results showed that grandiose narcissism positively predicted cognitive flexibility (β = 0.61, p <0.001), whereas vulnerable narcissism negatively predicted it (β = –0.44, p = .012). Religious attitudes did not significantly predict cognitive flexibility (β = 0.02, p = 0.814). The findings suggest that traits associated with grandiose narcissism—such as confidence and a sense of leadership—may enhance flexible thinking, while features of vulnerable narcissism—like shame and feelings of worthlessness—may inhibit it. Overall, the study highlights that personality characteristics might play a more prominent role than religious orientation in influencing an individual’s capacity for cognitive flexibility.

Keywords

How to Cite

Duman, M. K., & Guldas, F. Z. (2025). The relationship between narcissistic personality traits, religious attitudes, and cognitive flexibility . International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 16(61), 1391–1418. https://doi.org/10.70736/ijoess.1707

References

📄 Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
📄 Ashmawy, M. F. (2016). Ortaöğretimde narsisizm ve dindarlık ilişkisi (Sinop örneği) [Yüksek lisans tezi, On Dokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi].
📄 Barry, C. T., Frick, P. J., Adler, K. K., & Grafeman, S. J. (2006). The predictive utility of narcissism among children and adolescents: Evidence for a distinction between adaptive and maladaptive narcissism. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16(4), 508–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-006-9102-5
📄 Borráz-León, J. I., Spreitzer, A., Scrivner, C., Landers, M., Lee, R., & Maestripieri, D. (2023). Cortisol reactivity to psychosocial stress in vulnerable and grandiose narcissists: An exploratory study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1067456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1067456
📄 Bowen, K. N., Musarra, G. M., & Ou, Y. (2022). How and when narcissism and faith in humanity drive sustainable consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 39(9), 1706–1724. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21694