1
Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Sivas, Turkiye
2
Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Sivas, Turkiye
Abstract
Wrestling or any sporting competition, when viewed in general, is not only an arena where the winner and loser are determined, but also a stage where individuals internalize values such as discipline, determination and team spirit. Metaphor and metaphorical perception are important tools for understanding the complex structure of the human mind, especially the imaginations in the minds of athletes. Metaphors are not only a linguistic phenomenon, but also a basic cognitive mechanism that shapes individuals’ thoughts, emotions and behaviors. Therefore, studies on metaphor and metaphorical perception have great potential for understanding human nature. In this study, the perceptions of elite wrestlers who competed in the freestyle, Greco-Roman and women’s categories in the international arena towards the sport of wrestling were examined in depth through metaphors. Within the scope of the study, a semi-structured interview form was applied to 109 athletes with high-level wrestling experience and the data of 105 athletes were evaluated. Afterwards, the metaphors reflecting the athletes’ perspectives on wrestling were subjected to a phenomenological analysis process. The findings show that wrestling is not only a physical struggle but also a multidimensional phenomenon that requires discipline, determination, patience and strategy. In this context, it was observed that the elite athletes participating in the study identified themselves with this branch at a high level.
Keywords
Wrestler,Identification,Sports,Loyalty,Life
How to Cite
Tuncer, M., & Gul, M. (2025). Metaphorical perspectives of elite wrestlers on the sport of wrestling. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 16(60), 778–791. https://doi.org/10.70736/ijoess.1693
📄Akandere, M., Aktaş, S., & Er, Y. (2018). Zihinsel antrenman ve spor. Türkiye Barolar Birliği, 60, 74.
📄Bektaş, F., Türkmen, M., Yılmaz, İ., Gül, M., & Karaman, G. (2014). Perceptions of doping from wrestlers of the Turkish National Team using the metaphor method. International Journal of Wrestling Science, 4(2), 55-62.
📄Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press.
📄Butterworth, M. L. (2023). The rhetoric of sport. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication.
📄Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem.
📄Cevizci, A. (2003). Felsefe terimleri sözlüğü. Türkiye: Paradigma.
📄Considine, T. (1982). The language of sport: A handy dictionary of sporting terms. Birleşik Krallık: Angus & Robertson.
📄Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
📄Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
📄Demir, B. Ç. (2024). Reklamlarda kullanılan metaforun kuramsal temelleri 1. İletişim ve Medya Alanında Uluslararası Araştırmalar I, 25.
📄Dervent, F. (2016). An examination of conceptualization of sport metaphors. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 259-268.
📄Dur, B. U. (2016). Metafor ve ekslibris. EX-LIBRIST-Uluslararası Ekslibris Dergisi, 3(5), 122-128.
📄Eisenhart, M. (2009). Generalization from qualitative inquiry. In Generalizing from educational research (pp. 61-76). Routledge.
📄Fletcher, D., & Sarkar, M. (2012). A grounded theory of psychological resilience in Olympic champions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(5), 669-678.
📄Gould, D., Dieffenbach, K., & Moffett, A. (2002). Psychological characteristics and their development in Olympic champions. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14(3), 172-204.
📄Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.
📄Gül, M., Uzun, R. N., & Çebi, M. (2018). Türk kültürlerindeki geleneksel oyunlar ve sporlara yüzeysel bir bakış. Journal of Turkish Studies, 13(26), 655-671. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.14386
📄Gül, O., Yurtsızoğlu, Z., & Yıldız, Z. (2024). Spor bilimleri fakültesi öğrencilerinin elektronik spor tüketimine yönelik metaforik yaklaşımları. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.1420275
📄Hançerlioğlu, O. (1977). Felsefe ansiklopedisi (Kavramlar ve Akımlar) Cilt 3, Remzi Kitabevi Yayınları, İstanbul
📄İnan, M., Dervent, F., & Karadağ, B. (2019). Spor Paydaşlarının fairplay kavramına ilişkin metaforik algıları. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 30(2), 85-95.
📄Jones, I. (2022). Research methods for sports studies. Routledge.
📄Karahüseyinoğlu, M. F. (2007). Küreselleşme ve geleneksel Türk sporları (Doctoral dissertation, Marmara Universitesi (Turkey).
📄Kaya, D. G., & Günay, M. (2020). Güreş grekoromen milli sporcularının imgeleme ve başarı motivasyon düzeyleri arasindaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(3), 62-72.
📄Kesić, D., & Muhić, Е. (2013). Sports in metaphor and metaphor in sports. Sport Logia, 9(1), 28-33.
📄Korobeynikov, G., Korobeinikova, L., Raab, M., Korobeinikova, I., Danko, T., Kokhanevich, A., ... et al. (2022). Psychophysiological state and decision making in wrestlers. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 22(5), 1-9.
📄Krane, V., & Baird, S. M. (2005). Using ethnography in applied sport psychology. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17(2), 87-107.
📄Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195-208.
📄Levine, P. M. (2005). Metaphors and images of classrooms. Kappa Delta pi Record, 41(4), 172-175
📄Marshall, G. (2003). Sosyoloji sözlüğü. Türkiye: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları.
📄Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE.
📄Mirzaei, B. (2021). Development of the elite wrestling athlete. International Journal of Wrestling Science, 11(1), 11.
📄Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2025). Ensuring validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2024-104232
📄Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). The applications of qualitative methods to social research (pp. 24-46). London.
📄Schmitt, R. (2005). Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 358-394.
📄Shields, D., & Bredemeier, B. (2011). Contest, competition, and metaphor. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 38(1), 27-38.
📄Smith, B., & Sparkes, A. C. (2009). Narrative inquiry in sport and exercise psychology: What can it mean, and why might we do it?. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(1), 1-11.
📄Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2021). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage.
📄Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik. Seçkin Yayıncılık Sanayi ve Ticaret A. Ş., Ankara.
📄Taylor, J., & Wilson, G. S. (2005). Applying sport psychology: Four perspectives. Human Kinetics.
📄Weinberg, R. S., & Gould, D. (2023). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. Human Kinetics.
📄Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara. ISBN, 975(02), 007.
📄Yıldırım, Y., Arabacı, R., Topçu, H., & Vardar, T. (2019). The relationship between some physical fitness characteristics and body composition of elite wrestlers. International Journal of Physical Education, Fitness and Sports, 8(1), 25-32.
📄Yılmaz, F., Göçen, S., & Yılmaz, F. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmen kavramına ilişkin algıları: Bir metaforik çalışma. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9 (1).
📄Yılmaz, İ., Bektaş, F., Türkmen, M., Gül, M., Karaman, G., & Akgül, Ö. (2014). Analysing wrestlers perceptions of wrestling by studying the metaphors of the athletes who have wrestled for Turkish National Wrestling Team. International Journal of Wrestling Science, 4(2), 48–55.
,
Mehmet Gul
2