A longitudinal study on the transformation of privacy in Türkiye: Family, divorce, sexuality


DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70736/ijoess.563Keywords:
Family, Divorce, sexuality, social changeAbstract
The family, as one of the most ancient institutions, serves as the individual’s first window to the world. Since the existence of the first human, this institution has undergone various transformations, adapting to changes over time. While defining a universal concept of “family” remains challenging, especially in the post-industrial society, the world has witnessed rapid transformations. With the advancement of information technologies, the traditional family structure has shifted, evolving from a unit focused solely on reproduction, meeting physiological needs, providing shelter, and fostering mutual responsibilities among its members, to a dynamic institution that adapts to the demands and conditions of its era. Through the processes of modernization and postmodernization, societal norms regarding the family have experienced significant transformations. In traditional societies, marriage functioned as more than a personal bond; it played a crucial role in maintaining social order. However, modernization has redefined this relationship through increasing individualism and the quest for freedom. The proliferation of mass communication tools has made issues such as gender roles, sexuality, divorce, out-of-wedlock childbirth, and restructured families more visible. Consequently, the concepts of family and marriage have become more fluid and dynamic. These changes not only reflect shifts in individual life practices but also mirror the transformation of societal values. This study aims to illustrate how family-related values, judgments, and diversity have evolved over time. Utilizing quantitative research methods, a longitudinal analysis was conducted based on data from the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th waves of the World Values Survey. Secondary data analysis was performed using SPSS software, employing chi-square tests for categorical variables and ANOVA for continuous measures over the years. The analyses revealed an increase in individualism and flexibility in family relationships. However, traditional perceptions, such as the societal role of women and the emphasis on motherhood, were found to change at a slower pace.
References
Ahlm, J. (2017). Respectable promiscuity: Digital cruising in an era of queer liberalism. Sexualities, 20(3), 364-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460716665783
Amato, P.R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and The Family, 62, 1269-1287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01269.x
Amato, P. R., & Beattie, B. (2011). Does the unemployment rate affect the divorce rate? An analysis of state data 1960–2005. Social Science Research, 40(3), 705–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.12.012
Aydemir, M. A. & Tecim, E. (2012). Türk toplumunda aile ve dinin toplumsal sermaye potansiyeli. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28, 42-59. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/metder/issue/31233/455469
Baudrillard, J. (2016). Simülakrlar ve simülasyon (O. Adanır, Çev.). Doğubatı Yayınları.
Bauman, Z. (2009). Akışkan aşk- insan ilişkilerinde kırılganlığa dair (I. Ergüden, Çev.). Versus Yayınları.
Bauman, Z. (2019). Akışkan modernite. Can Yayınları.
Bayer, A. (2013). Değişen toplumsal yapıda aile. Şırnak Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(8), 101-129.
Beck, U., & Beck E. (2012). Aşkın normal kaosu (N. Ermiş, Çev.). İmge Yayınevi.
Burcu, E., Yıldırım, F., Sırma, Ç., & Sanıyaman, S. (2015). Çiçeklerin kaderi: Türkiye’de kadınların erken evliliği üzerine nitel bir araştırma. Türk Dünyası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Bilig, 73(Bahar), 63-98.
Butler, J. (2014). Cinsiyet belası. Metis Yayınları.
Browne, K., Lim, J., Hall, J., & McGlynn, N. (2021). Sexual(ities that) progress: Introduction. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420954213
Cohen, P. N. (2014). Recession and divorce in the United States, 2008–2011. Population Research and Policy Review, 33(5), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-014-9323-z
Foucault, M. (2007). Cinselliğin tarihi (H. U. Tanrıöver, Çev.). Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Freud, S. (2009). Cinsellik üzerine (S. Kutlu, Çev.). Alter Yayıncılık.
Giddens, A. (2000). Sosyoloji ( H. Özel- C. Güzel, Çev.). Ayraç Yayınları.
Giddens, A. (2012). Sosyoloji kısa fakat eleştirel bir giriş (4. Baskı). (Ü. Y. Battal, Çev.). Siyasal Kitabevi.
Giddens, A. (2014). Mahremiyetin dönüşümü. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
González-Val, R., & Marcén, M. (2017). Divorce and the business cycle: A cross-country analysis. Review of Economics of the Household, 15(3), 879–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-016-9329-x
Hasinoff, A. A. (2016). How to have great sext: Consent advice in online sexting tips. Communication & Critical/Cultural Studies, 13, 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2015.1077980
Härkönen, J., Billingsley, S. & Hornung, M. (2020). Divorce trends in seven countries over the long transition from state socialism: 1981–2004. In: Mortelmans, D. (Ed.), Divorce in Europe: European Studies of Population, (pp.63-89). Springer.
Inglehart, R., C. Haerpfer, A. Moreno, C. Welzel, K. Kizilova, J. Diez-Medrano, M. Lagos, P., … et al. (eds.). (2022.) World Values Survey: All Rounds - Country-Pooled Datafile. Madrid, Spain & Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. Dataset Version 3.0.0. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.17
Jones, T. (2011). A sexuality education discourses framework: Conservative, liberal, critical, and postmodern. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 6(2), 133–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2011.571935
Kaptanoğlu, Y. İ., & Ergöçmen, B. (2012). Çocuk gelin olmaya giden yol. Türkiye Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(2), 128-161.
Kasapoğlu, A. (1990). Birey, aile, toplum. I. Aile Şûrası. Aile Araştırma Kurumu.
Koç, İ., & Saraç, M. (2019). Türkiye’de ilk evlilik yaşının ve evliliğe ilişkin pratiklerin değişimi ve boşanma ile ilişkisi (ss. 88-133). Türkiye Aile Yapısı İleri İstatistik Analizi. TDV Yayın Matbaacılık Ticari İşletmesi.
Oren, A. & A. Ben-Ari (2020). Between abnormal “otherness” to groundbreaking “uniqueness”: The family-construction process of the lgbt family. Journal of Homosexuality, 67 (11), 1603-1624. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1600901
Özgüven, İ. E. (2000). Evlilik ve aile terapisi. Psikolojik Danışma Rehberlik Eğitim Merkezi Yayını.
Pallant, J. (2017). SPSS kullanma kılavuzu (Balcı, B. Ahi, Çev.). Anı Yayıncılık.
Poole, M. (2005). Family: changing families, changing times. Allen & Unwin.
Paris, G. (2016). Cinselliğin önemi: Arzuya kavuşmak (Z. Hürmüz, Çev.). Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Ritzer, G. (2000). Büyüsü bozulmuş dünyayı büyülemek (S. Kaya, Çev.). Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Russell, B. (2014). Evlilik ve ahlak (E. Gürol, Çev.). Cem Yayınevi.
Sümer Z. H. (2015). Gender, religiosity, sexual activity, sexual knowledge, and attitudes toward controversial aspects of sexuality. Journal of Religion and Health, 54(6), 2033–2044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-014-9831-5
Timurturkan, M. (2016). Aile birliğinin bozulması: boşanma ve yeniden evlenme. N. Adak (Edt.), Değişen Toplumda Değişen Aile (ss. 201-218). Siyasal Kitabevi.
Turgut, F. (2017). Tarihsel süreçte aile kurumunun dönüşümü ve geleceğine yönelik çıkarımlar. Medeniyet ve Toplum, 1(1), 93-117. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/metder/issue/31233/455469
TÜİK, 2023. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Evlenme-ve-Bosanma-Istatistikleri-2023-53707
Ulutaş, E. (2013). Aile-ekonomi ilişkisi. M. Aydın (Edt.), Sistematik Aile Sosyolojisi (ss. 335-355). Çizgi Kitabevi.
Ünal, V. (2013). Geleneksel geniş aileden çekirdek aileye geçiş sürecinde boşanma sorunu ve din. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(26), 588-602.
Weeks, J. (2003). Sexuality (2nd ed.). Routledge.
WVS. (2020a). Data and documentation. World Values Survey https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp
WVS. (2020b). What we do? World Values Survey, https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp
Yıldırım, E. (2016). Toplumsal değişme sürecinde aile. K. Canatan & E. Yıldırım (Edt.), Aile sosyolojisi (ss. 139-155). Açılım Kitabevi.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aylin Cicekli

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.