Farklı programlama araçlarının öğretmen adaylarının öz-yeterlik inançları ve bilgi işlemsel düşünme becerileri üzerindeki etkisi


Özet Görüntüleme: 97 / PDF İndirme: 34

Yazarlar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70736/ijoess.540

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Bilgi işlemsel düşünme- matematik öğretimi- öğretmen adayları- öz-yeterlik inançları- programlama öğretimi

Özet

Bu çalışma, farklı programlama araçlarının sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının öz-yeterlik inançları ve bilgi işlemsel düşünme becerileri üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenliği Programına kayıtlı 47 üniversite öğrencisiyle 12 hafta süren araştırmada, ön test-son test ölçümlerine dayalı yarı deneysel bir desen kullanılmıştır. Katılımcılar, blok tabanlı programlama (Scratch) ve metin tabanlı programlama (C#) kullanan iki deney grubuna ayrılmıştır. Araştırma, farklı programlama yaklaşımlarının bilgi işlemsel düşünme ve matematik öğretiminde öz-yeterlik üzerindeki etkilerini sistematik olarak karşılaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bulgular, bilgi işlemsel düşünme becerileri ile öz-yeterlik inançları arasında güçlü bir pozitif ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Her iki programlama aracı da bu becerilerin gelişimine önemli katkı sağlarken, gruplar arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır. Bu sonuçlar, programlama etkinliklerinin öğretmenlik için temel yetkinlikleri geliştirdiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Öğretmen yetiştirme programlarında programlama eğitiminin entegrasyonu, teknoloji destekli öğretim ortamlarına hazırlık açısından kritik öneme sahiptir. Ayrıca, programlamanın problem çözme, mantıksal akıl yürütme ve uyum sağlama gibi üst düzey düşünme becerilerinin gelişimine katkıda bulunduğu vurgulanmaktadır.

Referanslar

Ampofo, C. (2019). Relationship between pre-service teachers’ mathematics self-efficacy and their mathematics achievement. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v15i1.3

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4.

Bandura, A., & Wessels, S. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, 4, 71-81. New York: Academic Press.

Betz, N., & Luzzo, D. (1996). Career assessment and the career decision-making self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 413 - 428. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279600400405

De-La-Peña, C., Fernádez-Cézar, R., & Solano-Pinto, N. (2021). Attitude toward mathematics of future teachers: How important are creativity and cognitive flexibility?. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713941

Erdem, E. (2018). The investigation of different teaching strategies during teaching programming process in block based environment in terms of different factors. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Başkent University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

Gomes, A., & Mendes, A. J. (2007). Learning to program-difficulties and solutions. In International Conference on Engineering Education–ICEE, 7.

Göloğlu-Demir, C. (2011). Analysis of self-efficacy beliefs and attitudes of students at the department of elementary mathematics education regarding mathematics education. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Gazi University, Ankara.

Hsu, T.C., Chang, S.C., & Hung, Y.T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of literature. Computers & Education, 126, 296-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004

Hu, L. (2023). Programming and 21st century skill development in K-12 schools: A multidimensional meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40, 610-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12904

ISTE (2022). Computational Thinking Competencies. ISTE. https://iste.org/standards/computational-thinking-competencies

Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Angeli, C. (2017). Effect of robotics on elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, science learning, and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26, 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9663-z

Jiang, H., Turnbull, D., Wang, X., Chugh, R., Dou, Y., & Chen, S. (2022). How do mathematics interest and self-efficacy influence coding interest and self-efficacy? A structural equation modeling analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 115, 102058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102058

Kandemir, C. M. (2018). Text-based programming. Pegem Citation Index, 267-294.

Klassen, R., & Tze, V. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EDUREV.2014.06.001

Korkmaz, Ö., Çakir, R., & Özden, MY (2017). A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 558-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005

Krpan, D., Mladenović, S., & Rosić, M. (2015). Undergraduate programming courses, students’ perception and success. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3868-3872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1126

Lai, A. F., & Yang, S. M. (2011, September). The learning effect of visualized programming learning on 6 th graders’ problem solving and logical reasoning abilities. In 2011 international conference on electrical and control engineering (pp. 6940-6944). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECENG.2011.6056908

Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12?. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012

Ma, K., McMaugh, A., & Cavanagh, M. (2022). Changes in pre-service teacher self-efficacy for teaching in relation to professional experience placements. Australian Journal of Education, 66(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441211060474

Martin, L. E., & Mulvihill, T. M. (2019). Voices in education: Teacher self-efficacy in education. The Teacher Educator, 54(3), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2019.1615030

MEB (2018). Mathematics curriculum of the turkish ministry of national education. Turkish Ministry of National Education. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201813017165445-MATEMATİK%20ÖĞRETİM%20PROGRAMI%202018v.pdf

Medlock-Walton, P., Harms, K., Kraemer, E., Brennan, K., & Wendel, D. (2014). Blocks-based programming languages: simplifying programming for different audiences with different goals. Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538873

Özdemir, A., Yaman, C., & Vural, R. A. (2018). Development of the teacher self-efficacy scale for STEM practices: A validity and reliability study. Adnan Menderes University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 5(2), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.30803/adusobed.427718

Peracaula-Bosch, M., & González-Martínez, J. (2022). Developing computational thinking among preservice teachers. Qwerty - Open and Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education, 57 https://doi.org/10.30557/qw000049

Psycharis, S., Kallia, M. (2017). The effects of computer programming on high school students’ reasoning skills and mathematical self-efficacy and problem solving. Instructional Science, 45, 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9421-5

Puente, E. (2022). Effect of the use of block-based languages in programming learning. 2022 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIE56031.2022.9982348

Reichardt, C. S. (2009). Quasi-experimental design. The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology, 46-71.

Rich, P.J., Mason, S.L., & O’Leary, J. (2021). Measuring the impact of continuous professional development on elementary teachers’ self-efficacy to teach coding and computational thinking. Computers & Education, 168, 104196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104196

Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2018). Can computational talent be detected? Predictive validity of the computational thinking test. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 18, 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.004

Santos-Trigo, M. (2020). Problem-solving in mathematics education. Encyclopedia of mathematics education, 686-693. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_129

Sarantseva, S. (2024). Self-Efficacy in the context of professional activity. Obshchenauchnyy zhurnal (General Science Academic Journal). https://doi.org/10.33920/nik-04-2401-07

Sayın, Z., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2016). Yeni bir 21. yüzyıl becerisi olarak kodlama eğitimi ve kodlamanın eğitim politikalarına etkisi. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı, 3(5), 1-13.

Seow, P., Looi, C.K., Wadhwa, B., Wu, L., Liu, L., Kong, S.C., & Li, K. (2017). Computational thinking and coding initiatives in Singapore. In Conference Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education (pp. 164-167).

Shin, M. H. (2018). Effects of Project-Based Learning on Students’ Motivation and Self-Efficacy. English teaching, 73(1), 95-114. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.73.1.201803.95

Sırakaya, D. A. (2019). Programlama öğretiminin bilgi işlemsel düşünme becerisine etkisi. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 23(2), 575-590.

Subramaniam, S., Maat, S. M., & Mahmud, M. S. (2022). Computational thinking in mathematics education: A systematic review. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(6), 2029-2044. http://dx.doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i6.7494

Swars, S., Hart, L.C., Smith, SZ, Smith, M.E., & Tolar, T. (2007). A longitudinal study of elementary pre‐service teachers’ mathematics beliefs and content knowledge. School science and mathematics, 107(8), 325-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2007.tb17797.x

Thomas,J., Odemwingie, O.C., Saunders, Q. & Watlerd, M. (2015). Understanding the difficulties African-American middle school girls face while engaging computational algorithmic thinking in the context of game design. Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 3(1), 15-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.15640/jcsit.v3n1a2

Wang, H. Y., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). Effects of an integrated scratch and project-based learning approach on the learning achievements of gifted students in computer courses. In Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAIAAI), 2014 IIAI 3rd International Conference on (pp. 382-387). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2014.85

Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2017). Comparing block-based and text-based programming in high school computer science classrooms. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 18(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3089799

YÖK. (2018). New teacher training undergraduate programs, primary mathematics teaching undergraduate program. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Yeni-Ogretmen-Yetistirme-Lisans-Programlari/Ilkogretim_Matematik_Lisans_Programi.pdf

Zhao, M., Zhao, M., Wang, X.H., & Ma, H.L. (2020, December). Promoting teaching self-efficacy in computational thinking of school teachers. In 2020 Ninth International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT) (pp. 235-239). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT50754.2020.00048

Zuya, HE, Kwalat, SK, & Attah, BG (2016). Pre-service teachers’ mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics teaching self-efficacy. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(14), 93-98.

Yayınlanmış

2025-03-15

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Erümit, A. K., Özmen, S., & Cebeci, H. Y. (2025). Farklı programlama araçlarının öğretmen adaylarının öz-yeterlik inançları ve bilgi işlemsel düşünme becerileri üzerindeki etkisi. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(59), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.70736/ijoess.540